Badger vaccine partial success – But culling still recommended02/12/2010 15:10:21Badger vaccine will help disease control if used in conjunction with culling December 2010. Control of bovine tuberculosis (TB) in cattle has proven particularly challenging where reservoirs of infection exist in wildlife populations. In Britain and Ireland, control is hampered by a reservoir of infection in Eurasian badgers. Badger culling Reduced infection levels First badger vaccine licensed 74% reduction in infection The results of the modelling were:
The blood test is not an absolute indicator of protection from disease, so the field results cannot tell us the degree of vaccine efficacy. While the findings indicate a clear effect of vaccination on badger disease, data from the laboratory and field studies do not lend themselves to giving a definitive figure for BadgerBCG vaccine efficacy. Nor do they provide information on the effect of badger vaccination in reducing TB incidence in cattle. Professor Glyn Hewinson, Head of the TB Research Group at the VLA, and Professor Robbie McDonald, Head of the Wildlife and Emerging Diseases Programme at Fera, said: "VLA and Fera are very proud to have conducted the programme of work on BadgerBCG and that a vaccine is now available for use in the field as one of the tools for tackling bovine TB. In making the data available today, we hope that people will be able to see for themselves the detailed research that went into the development of the vaccine and understand the opportunities and challenges of using vaccination." Positive result? The results of the modelling were consistent with the conclusions of the Randomised Badger Culling Trial indicating that there were both positive and negative effects of culling. The modelling shows that badger vaccination could make a positive contribution to disease control in its own right and was consistently positive when used in combination with culling in a ring vaccination strategy. Wildlife Extra questions what measure has been used for ‘positive'? Has this been taken measured from the point of view of farmers or wildlife?
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Read the comments about this article and leave your own comment
How many more times does it have to be stated that a cull would not work ? why the hell is this not being listened to there are so many things in this world that has shown or been stated wont work and it is left at that so why do people have to continue to pursue and persicute badgers when will this end
Posted by: Hayley | 04 Dec 2010 15:58:39
Totally bemused and disgusted that our so called government will allow this so called cull, it has already been proved that a cull would not work.
Why dont they cull the real danger to British Dairy farmers - The Supermarkets!!!!
I and my family have wrote to DEFRA, I feel so strongly about this we CAN NOT let it happen.
Posted by: rachell | 04 Dec 2010 13:42:35
Ever since humans arrived on the British islands it has been our pleasure to eradicate wildlife that stood in out way: Reindeer, Brown Bear, Lynx, Wolf, Wild Boar to name only a few.
The arguments haven’t changed either: money, money, money and money.
Has it still not occurred to us that there is more value to diverse wildlife (2010 year of biodiversity) than the official milk maiden’s calculation of direct cost benefit analysis?
Why don’t we just cull all higher wildlife, deer, the re-emerged wild boars, badgers, fixes, hares rabbits, just everything. I am sure Britain would be a far more profitable place to live-says the milk maiden…
Posted by: Jens Stahlschmidt | 03 Dec 2010 15:36:38