Biofuels carbon con revealed24/03/2011 10:32:31
UNDER THREAT: The sokoke scops owl is just one of the many species put dangerously at risk by Europe's demand for biofuels March 2011: African biofuels destined for Europe will result in up to six times the carbon emissions of fossil fuels, a new study has revealed. The report, commissioned by the RSPB, ActionAid and Nature Kenya, focuses on the Dakatcha Woodlands in Kenya which are set to be destroyed to make way for jatropha plantations. Campaigners say the results of the study make a mockery of claims that biofuels are a green, renewable alternative to fossil fuels. Biofuel currently makes up around 3.5 per cent of the petrol and diesel in UK fuel pumps. However, the UK Government wants to increase this to meet EU targets. The Dakatcha Woodlands is one of the last remaining coastal forests in Kenya and is home to thousands of indigenous tribespeople who will be made homeless if the plans go ahead, as well as a range of threatened wildlife. Wildlife threatened by Europe's demand for biofuels Dr Helen Byron, RSPB's Kenya expert, said: ‘The Dakatcha Woodlands are a haven for wildlife and the threat they face is a direct result of European demand for biofuels. No government has done a proper assessment of biofuels imported from overseas to see if they will, in fact, reduce our carbon emissions - so we decided to do it for them. ‘We were shocked to discover that the biofuel produced from the proposed plantations at Dakatcha will result in up to six times more carbon emissions than fossil fuels.' Tim Rice, ActionAid's biofuels expert, said: ‘Biofuels are far from the miracle climate cure they were thought to be. Like most other biofuels, jatropha could actually end up increasing carbon emissions. ‘Crucially the Dakatcha case also shows how biofuel plantations can create huge social upheaval with whole communities losing their land, homes and jobs.' Disastrous impact on climate, nature and people Dr Byron continued: ‘The proposed plantation in Dakatcha is just one example of the disastrous but unseen impact of biofuels on the climate, nature and people - there are plenty more coming to light all the time. ‘The UK Government recognises the problems that subsidising biofuels is causing across the world and last week announced that it intends to limit such subsidies. But ministers must go further, they must challenge the European targets for biofuels and instead adopt an ambitious programme to reduce emissions from cars through improving efficiency and a massive roll-out of electric vehicles.' Taking into account the emissions produced throughout the production process, the study found that jatropha would emit between 2.5 and six times more greenhouse gases than fossil fuels. The area is also a global biodiversity hotspot and home to a number of globally threatened animal and bird species including the spectacular Fischer's turaco, southern banded snake eagle, Sokoke scops owl, and the Sokoke pipit. The Clarke's weaver bird is found in only two places on Earth and is threatened with extinction if the plantation goes ahead.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Read the comments about this article and leave your own comment
I definitely have mixed feelings about biofuels and agree that they aren't a magic bullet. However, this study seems to look at a poor application of biofuels and use it as a measure for biofuels in general.
One of the things that makes jatropha a "second generation" biofuel is that it can grow in very marginal lands. The fact that a woodland is being destroyed for this jatropha plantation means that the project is a bad one, but not necessarily jatropha in general. The fact that trees were growing in this area means a different area should have been chosen for the project to begin with.
Am I correct in assuming that the carbon impact of cutting the trees is included in the "six times the emissions" calculation?
Posted by: Mark Jordahl | 28 Mar 2011 12:36:49