Angling MP would rather drown worms than see beavers08/12/2009 15:19:32One-eyed & unbalanced view However Wildlife Extra believes that this is the sort of one-eyed, unbalanced view that does no-one any favours, especially Mr Salter, as it is so obviously leaning towards the anglers view. If Mr Salter is so worried about the state of fish stocks, perhaps he should stop advocating killing them in such large numbers for sport. Beavers were released in November 2009. Labour's Parliamentary Angling spokesman, Martin Salter, used last week's Commons debate on fisheries to describe as "ludicrous" plans by Natural England to re-introduce the beaver to the English countryside. He claims that they are "four stone giant rodents" and, rationally, that "Natural England envisages an army of highly literate beavers in council uniforms carefully consulting maps of flood risk sites before deciding which trees to chop down"; he even asks "why do we not take the DNA of Tyrannosaurus Rex?" Despite plenty of evidence to the contrary, Mr Salter claims that releasing beavers in England will cause flooding, be bad for woodlands and devastate fish stocks. Wildlife Extra wonders if he is worried about the fish themselves, or spoiling the fun of the worm drowners that Mr Salter champions. Evidence from Canada, where they know a few things about beavers, is that "Through their damming activities beaver supply up to 25% of the low summer water reserves required for viable fish habitat" (See below for more). Additionally the wildlife authorities of Oregon stats that :- "Beaver dams can be of tremendous benefit to Oregon's native fish.
Canada is well known for its salmon fishing, despite having a few beavers breeding there. In fact the beaver population of North America is estimated at 15 million, though this is a long way short of the 200 million estimated to live there before Europeans arrived. Fish do seem to have survived in Britain, and everywhere else where beavers have thrived in the past, or do now. However the Reading West MP has highlighted new legislation that is designed to remove obstructions to migrating fish seeking spawning grounds. Mr Salter said "The current situation is ludicrous. On the one hand, we are seeking to ensure that migratory fish can run the rivers and reach the spawning grounds. On the other, Natural England talks of reintroducing the beaver, the one creature which, by creating dams, will ensure that all our legislation on fish passes becomes absolutely worthless. If we really have to introduce endangered species, why do we not take the DNA of Tyrannosaurus Rex or the wolf and bring them back to Britain? There must come a point at which reality impinges on what Natural England seeks to do." In March, Natural England and the People's Trust for Endangered Species published a feasibility study into the re-introduction of the European beaver and acknowledged the "contribution that beavers make to river and wetland management." The study stated that "it is clearly feasible to re-introduce beavers into England with many consequent benefits, not least for beavers to assist with river and floodplain restoration." However Mr Salter believes "These must be two of the most absurd statements uttered by a publicly funded body in recent years. Quite clearly Natural England envisages an army of highly literate beavers in council uniforms carefully consulting maps of flood risk sites before deciding which trees to chop down and where to build their dams! In reality, these are four stone giant rodents with a genetic programme set to cause deforestation and flooding. Hardly a priority for the English countryside at a time when we are trying to plant more trees and alleviate the effects of the worst flooding many communities have ever experienced." Deforestation Fishing again Other proposed release locations in the Natural England study include the Weald of Kent, the Peak District, the Forest of Bowland and, incredibly, the Lake District. Mr Salter added "The prospect of unconstrained beaver dams raising flood water levels still higher will be greeted as a sick joke by people in Cumbria who are still clearing up the wreckage of the November flooding.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Read the comments about this article and leave your own comment
While the Labour MP reported here is clearly talking sheer nonsense, I'm not convinced that the Wildlife Extra response to it here is up to much and in fact could do more damage than good.
Firstly- I understand that animal rights-inclined individuals have a big problem with fishing but the other 90% of us, by and large, don't. While I think catch and release is cruel, I pesonally support fishing for the table when it is sustainable and I think vilifying all fishing enthusiasts as 'worm drowners' (surely the most 'playground' bit of name calling I've seen in a while) is going to loose the support of some of the people who frankly know British waterways best and do the most to care for them. Beavers need anglers on-side or the whole project is doomed.
Secondly- refering to studies of american beavers is a wholely counterproductive tactic: they are a different species- Castor canadensis, and their dams are massive efforts by comparison to the euro-beaver Castor fiber. Flooding is clearly an emotive issue right now so to enthusiastically plug the landscape engineering of the american rodent is playing right into the hands of the knee-jerk, uninformed beaver-reintroduction critics. Instead it would be far more effective to point out that Castor fiber dams are more modest affairs which would slow the release of water downstream- which would potentially make deluges like that which happened in Cumbria recently LESS likely!
Science is ultimately the greatest counter against the bizarre claims of the anti-beaver mob. Invite them to back their statements with real scientific evidence: they can't, probably because their isn't any! On the beaver's side there is positive conservation, forestry and fisheries data from countries where euro-beavers are common and also the clear economic data on how reintroduction tourism can bring huge benefits to regions- think of the Red Kite in mid-Wales and Sea Eagle on Mull. It wouldn't hurt to also point to the fishing lobby's comparative blind spot when it comes to the fish-guzzling feral mink.
Unless those of us pushing beaver reintroduction get real and use effective ways of argueing I can see this being another debate we will loose. Beaver reintroduction should be the easy win in the UK, the vanguard for other less inoccuous species- instead it could become the tombstone on the grave of effective habitat restoration.
Lift your game Wildlife Extra- I usually love your articles but this one sucked! (although, to be honest the 'albino animal spotted' stories are getting pretty lame, but thats another subject)
Posted by: Mark | 11 Dec 2009 11:05:23 PM