‘Successful’ IWC meeting ends in chaos15/07/2011 10:16:23IWC Walk OutDelegations who abandoned the room when the Chair called for voting: Japan, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cote d'Ivoire, the Gambia, Iceland, Norway, Nauru, Mongolia, Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, Grenada, Kiribati, Morocco, Korea, Ghana, Palau, Togo, Tuvalu, St.Kitts and Nevis and St. Lucia.Twenty countries led by Japan walked out of a meeting at the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in order to block plans to approve a sanctuary that would protect whales in South American waters. The proposal was tabled by the Latin American block of countries (known as Group of Buenos Aires-GBA), led by Brazil and Argentina. After initial discussions didn't reach a consensus, IWC Chair Herman Osterhausen called for a vote. The Japanese delegation and its allies reacted by walking out, throwing the meeting into disarray. Marcela Vargas, Programmes Manager for the World Society for the Protection of Animals in Latin America said: "The attitude of the whaling nations and its allies is absolutely outrageous. To break the quorum of the Convention in order to block the vote for the Sanctuary demonstrates a complete disrespect for the most essential democratic tool to achieve agreements in the world." The Southern Atlantic Sanctuary proposal has been discussed for over 10 years, but this year received significant support from almost all the European countries, plus India, New Zealand and Monaco. The sanctuary proposal will now be discussed at the next IWC meeting, to be held in Panamá in 2012.
July 2011. Although the 63rd International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting in Jersey adopted a proposal by the United Kingdom to clean up the practices of the Commission, less than a day later Japan and its allies crashed the meeting by walking out en masse and breaking a quorum on a vote for the adoption of a whale sanctuary in the South Atlantic proposed by Argentina and Brazil. "The Sanctuary incorporates some important breeding grounds and migratory routes for whale species in southern hemisphere", says Sue Fisher, anti-whaling lead for WDCS (the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society). Whale conservation was left hanging on an interpretation of 14 words in the IWC rules of procedure on what constitutes a quorum, and now the decision on a sanctuary in the South Atlantic will be put back until the next IWC meeting in 2012. Reforms will make the Commission more transparent, and governments more accountable Reformed rules to stop ‘cash for votes' Despite the whaling nations continuing to bend and break international rules in order to slaughter and trade in whales, Fisher says there have been some big steps forward at IWC63 which bode well for the future of whales and promise much for the Commission's next meeting in Panama in 2012. WDCS will look back on IWC63 as a pivotal meeting for the future of cetaceans and the IWC itself, and a largely successful meeting for the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society. Subsistence hunting Marine debris These fruitful discussions in Jersey relating to the growing concerns over marine debris raised by WDCS have been welcomed by Mark Simmonds, WDCS's international director of science, who is delighted that the IWC (and WDCS) have added such an important conservation matter to its work programme and will now be investigating the impacts of the growing amounts of plastic debris in the oceans, killing and maiming unknown numbers of marine species, including whales and dolphins. "There have been a few examples of whale bodies coming ashore with large quantities of plastic bags and plastic sheeting packed inside their stomachs. The effects of eating plastics and how common or otherwise this may be are unknown. It may be that some whales are being exposed to increasing amounts of plastic in their world. They may be mistaking it for food or it may be mixed up with their prey and then eating it by accident. We just don't know for sure and we really need to try and find out.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Read the comments about this article and leave your own comment
Once again Japan due no doubt to paying bribes to other countries has succeeded in delaying firm action being taken by the IWC against commercial whaling. Many countries now benefit from encouraging whale watching, while those countries that are determined to continue building up stocks of unsold whale meat, continue to loose money. It is obvious that once again the brave efforts by Sea Shepherd will again be required to prevent the senseless slaughter of whales. I wonder what the Japanese people would say if they knew that their country , which is in deep financial problems is once again intending to waste a massive amount of money that could well be used for reconstruction projects that is urgently required by thousands of homeless Japanese.
Posted by: colin guest | 15 Jul 2011 19:40:27