Wildlife beyond nature reserves: RSPB thinks big to save UK wildlife06/05/2010 13:26:24Radical new approach to conservation
Futurescapes manager Aidan Lonergan said: ‘Nature reserves are vitally important - they are a refuge from where plants and animals can spread into the wider countryside. But that countryside is increasingly unfriendly to wildlife because of decades of habitat loss, which has robbed many species of food and shelter. Climate change threatens to add even further pressure. We need to turn that around' ‘We want whole landscapes where wildlife Futurescapes is the RSPB's response to the continued decline of the UK's wildlife and wild places. 2010 is the International Year of Biodiversity, the date by which biodiversity loss is meant to have been halted. Instead numbers of many species continue to fall. Other Futurescapes in development include:
To showcase its new approach, the RSPB has chosen the Greater Thames; more than 1,000 sq km straddling the river from Tower Bridge, along the estuary and out into the North Sea. The RSPB owns or managers about 40 sq km of land for wildlife on the Thames and has invested more than £50 million regenerating land and opening up large areas for people to enjoy. 'We have some unlikely bedfellows - but everyone needs to pull together to make this happen'
Aidan Lonergan said: ‘What's happening on the Thames is a fantastic example of what we want Futurescapes to achieve right across the UK. At first glance some of our partners on the Thames may seem unlikely bedfellows for the RSPB, but the transformation we want to see in our countryside is too big a job for any one organisation - everyone needs to pull together to make it happen.' He explained the concept behind this new, inclusive approach: ‘This is a crowded island and we need to meet the needs of wildlife alongside human uses of the countryside. We need our land to do more than one thing. If we succeed, it will not just be wildlife that wins. By taking a landscape scale approach for wildlife, we can improve other natural services provided by the land, including carbon storage, water management, and recreation, alongside food production and other important economic benefits.'
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Read the comments about this article and leave your own comment
So the RSPB have dusted off Futurescapes after it bombed for them nine years ago. The amount of public money they get for buying up land must have encouraged them to give it another go. Thus we are going to have more quaint and very tame landscape areas, modelled on late 19th century farms, to go along with the same from the Living Landscapes of the Wildlife Trust's who are also hoovering up public finds. Where is the national policy behind this? Oh yes, our statutory nature agencies are non-departmental public bodies, and thus unaccountable organisations that make it up as they go along. Through the BAP process, power has ended up in the hands of the conservation industry to make unaccountable decisons about the future of our wildlife. What we need in Britain is the democracy of something like le Grenelle Environnement in France where state and civil society engaged in developing a roadmap for the future of their ecology that is aspirational for wild nature in a way that isn't seen here.
www.self-willed-land.org.uk
Posted by: Mark Fisher | 09 May 2010 09:42:42
I applaud this forward thinking approach that RSPB is adopting but would like to point out that it is perhaps not as fresh and new as RSPB, or at least this article may lead you to think. The wildlife Trusts have a very similar (in fact sounds almost identical, see www.wildlifetrusts.org/index.php?section=environment:livinglandscapes) scheme called Living Landscapes which sounds like they have been working on for several years and also the governments own stauatory body, Natural England, has similar initiatives and goes even further with regional biodiversity opportunity maps which are distributed to local authorities and councils to direct them into more joined up thinking when creating green corridors, designating local wildlife sites etc etc.
Posted by: Katy Auckland | 07 May 2010 19:49:58