Sign up for our Free email Newsletter
and get all the latest wildlife news!
Choose:

Six meetings – No decisions. Classic committee meetings as tuna stocks are decimated

16/06/2009 09:07:48
whales/Marine/tuna_trawl_jiminez

Fishing vessels taking in yet another tuna haul in the Tropical Eastern Pacific Ocean while the IATTC fails to take adequate action. Credit J Jimenez

Who will look out for the future of tuna?

June 2009. The Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) is the intergovernmental management authority comprised of 16 member countries with the mandate to regulate fishing fleets to avoid overexploitation of tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean. For the past six meetings over more than two years the IATTC has not taken a single decision to manage tuna populations. So tuna populations must be doing great, right? Wrong.

Exactly the opposite is true. As member countries bicker over the details of how to avoid further depleting stocks, tuna is not recovering. And it is not just conservation groups that say so, but rather the IATTC's own scientists. With increasing urgency at meeting after meeting these highly skilled fisheries experts have used some of the best fisheries information in existence as the basis for recommending a suite of urgently required specific, decisive actions to avoid over-fishing of tuna stocks.

Bigeye tuna on downward spiral
Things are not looking good for the fish, especially the region's bigeye tuna. These highly prized fish may be on the same downward spiral that have taken bluefin tuna in the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean to the brink of economic extinction.

Jobs at risk
And it's not only the fish that are at risk. Tens of thousands of jobs in poor communities that dot the coasts of Latin America depend on tuna processing for their livelihoods. Fisheries operators and government representatives at the IATTC argue that adopting the recommended management actions would have dire economic consequences for these people, as well as tuna boat operators and their crews.

All talk and no action - IATTC. Credit J Jimenez.

All talk and no action - IATTC. Credit J Jimenez.

Hard decisions needed
Conservation, research and non-governmental fisheries organizations argue that either hard decisions are taken now or impacts on the fish and people dependent on marine resources will only get worse.

International Seafood Sustainability Foundation
So who will look after the future of tuna? If recent history is repeated at the IATTC meetings this week in La Jolla, California, it will not be the IATTC. Fortunately, market mechanisms may force the IATTC's hand. A new consortium known as the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) is bringing together tuna processors, scientists and environmental non-governmental organizations to get behind the IATTC and other fisheries management organizations so they base management on scientific recommendations aimed to protect tuna stocks and reduce their impacts on non-target species such as dolphins, turtles, sharks and seabirds.

If the IATTC does not act soon, it will fall to consumers to make their tuna purchases from responsible processors and brands that offer fish from areas that are acting to ensure that tuna populations stay healthy for the long term. This would be not only good business and good news for the fish, but also for the consumers that enjoy tuna that is responsibly captured. But for now, all eyes are on the IATTC.

Read the comments about this article and leave your own comment

Sustainable Tuna

Greenpeace is trying to promote pole and line tuna fishing as a sustainable method, see <a href= www.greenpeace.org/international/press/reports/retailers-guide-skipjack" target="_blank"> www.greenpeace.org/international/press/reports/retailers-guide-skipjack</a> , but as yet it doesn't appear to be very widely available, if at all, in most major markets. There is a small pole and line tuna fishery in Cornwall, (see <a href= www.cornishtuna.com/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,1/" target="_blank"> www.cornishtuna.com/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,1/</a> ) but we don't know any more about it. Abel and Cole sell pole caught tuna from the Maldives, which is also tinned locally (see <a href= www.abelandcole.co.uk/content/pdf/180509.pdf" target="_blank"> www.abelandcole.co.uk/content/pdf/180509.pdf</a> ), however it is then shipped halfway round the world.

Posted by: | 22 Jun 2009 10:27:42

Who are the 'responsible processors and brands'?

The article says:'If the IATTC does not act soon, it will fall to consumers to make their tuna purchases from responsible processors and brands that offer fish from areas that are acting to ensure that tuna populations stay healthy for the long term.'

Well, I just enjoyed a can of tuna tonight - mixed with mayonnaise and corn, as millions of people do when they want something quick to eat - or when they buy a sandwich at the local deli - but I have no idea if the tuna was provided by 'responsible processors'. The article needs to add a list of such entities because without some solid information to guide us, none of us are any the wiser. Wild Life Extra could do a follow up article please, making it ultra clear which, if any, brands are delivering canned tuna from responsible fishermen and companies and which are not. Consumers can do nothing otherwise.

Posted by: Caroline Webb | 19 Jun 2009 04:23:12

To post a comment you must be logged in.
CLICK HERE TO LOG IN AND POST A COMMENT

New user? Register here

 

Click join and we will email you with your password. You can then sign on and join the discussions right away.